<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Kommentare zu: Enterprise 2.0 ROI revisited</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.marksimon.de/2009/04/22/enterprise-20-roi-revisited/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.marksimon.de/2009/04/22/enterprise-20-roi-revisited/</link>
	<description>This is what I am up to</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Apr 2010 20:29:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Von: A Quality Metric for Enterprise 2.0? &#124; MarkSimon.de</title>
		<link>http://blog.marksimon.de/2009/04/22/enterprise-20-roi-revisited/#comment-38</link>
		<dc:creator>A Quality Metric for Enterprise 2.0? &#124; MarkSimon.de</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 18 Jul 2009 08:04:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.marksimon.de/?p=187#comment-38</guid>
		<description>[...] I have to come back to what I have written about the ROI of Enterprise 2.0 applications. Here and here I phrased an idea of using sociological tool sets to grasp the outcomes and possible benefits of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] I have to come back to what I have written about the ROI of Enterprise 2.0 applications. Here and here I phrased an idea of using sociological tool sets to grasp the outcomes and possible benefits of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

